IMS-FUTURE
| Test ID | CAP-IMS-FUTURE |
| Category | Capabilities |
| Type | Sequence (2 steps) |
| Scored | No |
| RFC | RFC 9110 §13.1.3 |
| RFC Level | SHOULD |
| Expected | 200 |
What it does
This is a sequence test — it sends an If-Modified-Since header with a date far in the future to check whether the server correctly ignores it.
Step 1: Initial GET (confirm 2xx)
GET / HTTP/1.1\r\n
Host: localhost:8080\r\n
Connection: keep-alive\r\n
\r\nVerifies the resource exists and returns a success response.
Step 2: Conditional GET (If-Modified-Since: future date)
GET / HTTP/1.1\r\n
Host: localhost:8080\r\n
If-Modified-Since: Thu, 01 Jan 2099 00:00:00 GMT\r\n
\r\nSends a future date. A compliant server must ignore an If-Modified-Since value that is later than the server’s current time and return the resource normally.
What the RFC says
“A recipient MUST ignore If-Modified-Since if the field value is not a valid HTTP-date, or if the field value is a date in the future (compared to the server’s current time).” — RFC 9110 §13.1.3
Why it matters
A server that blindly compares dates without checking whether the date is in the future could incorrectly return 304 Not Modified for every request with a future timestamp, allowing cache-poisoning or stale-content attacks.
Verdicts
- Pass — Step 2 returns
200(correctly ignores future date) - Warn — Server returns
304(didn’t validate the date against current time) - Fail — Unexpected error (non-2xx/304 response)